It seems like the national media has already awarded the Chicago Steel the Clark Cup as some kind of lifetime achievement award.
True, last year’s team ran away with the Anderson Cup, and were heavy favorites for the Clark Cup before Covid caused the sports world to stop turning. And they did win this year’s Anderson Cup, albeit in a season when the two conferences acted as separate leagues because of little to no inter-conference play for most teams.
And the perception out there is Chicago comes out and steamrolls their opponents. True, they do average nearly five goals per game, a number reminiscent of the 1980s Edmonton Oilers. But the perception and reality become very disparate from there.
For example, while the Steel average 4.9 goals per game, they do it with just 28.3 shots per game, the lowest total of any playoff team. And they give up 27.8 shots per game, more than three shots per game than their opponent in the Clark Cup Final, the Fargo Force. And their 3.4 goals against per game would rank among the West Division’s worst.
Talk about flying under the radar, the Force were overlooked by many entering the playoffs, as winning just three of their final ten games dropped them to fourth in the West. But after winning a best-of-three in Tri-City, the Force dominated a previously red-hot Sioux City team, outscoring them 9-2 in a two game sweep. To make things more impressive, starting goalie Brennan Boynton missed the last game and a half after a dubious game misconduct penalty in the second period of game two.
And the numbers aren’t that different from Chicago in many ways. They are lower scoring but better defensively, outscoring their opponents 3.1-2.7 on average, but faring much better on shots, outshooting opponents by an average of 29.6-24.5.
Penalty minutes tell a very interesting story. Each team takes less penalty minutes than their opponent, but the numbers look from different eras. Chicago has taken 618 penalty minutes while their opponents have taken 652. Fargo has taken 830 penalty minutes, but their opponents have taken 1,081. In addition, Fargo leads in majors 20-8.
Regardless of what the perception is in the so-called new era of hockey that began after the 2005 NHL lockout, the reality is, physical and grinding usually beats speed and skill in a playoff series. And no offense to the USHL, but I’m not a fan of best-of-three (look for a blog with a proposal by stats guru Kevin Kasel next week regarding that), so this is sort of the first true series of the playoffs where one team can wear another down.
Chicago has two dynamic lines led by USHL scoring leader Sean Farrell (101 points) and USHL goals leader Matt Coronato (47) but the Steel are not physical. Nor are they big. They are prone to slow starts, they can get trapped in their own end for long periods of time, they score most of their goals off the rush and often struggle to maintain sustained pressure, and they can struggle against an aggressive forecheck. In reality, only Muskegon could take advantage of that in the East, and the Steel went 5-4-1 against Muskegon.
Fargo is a team by committee. Their leading scorer was Tristan Broz with 51 points. Fan favorite Austin Wong lead the team with 89 penalty minutes. In fact, when you look at the Force, nothing stands out other than goalie Boynton, who ranks in the top four in both goals against and save percentage. Yet the Force get things done, they do little things right, they play physical when they need to, and are good with the lead.
So how does this one end up? It’s anyone’s guess. In reality, it’s not hard to see either team winning in a sweep, because nobody knows how these two very different teams match up. And there is no team like Chicago in the West, but there is no team like Fargo in the East.
One x-factor could be the crowd. Unless things change before Friday (and there is some indication they may), Chicago is limited to 750 fans at their home arena, and it is expected as much as half of those will be Fargo fans. Meanwhile, Fargo has no restrictions, and is expected to play in front of a full house of 5,000-plus for games three and four, much as they did in game two against Sioux City.
PREDICTION: If there was only some way to figure this one out. Looking back in league history, this one reminds me a bit of the 2001 Clark Cup Final between Lincoln and Omaha. Lincoln lost just 7 of 56 regular season games and finished well ahead of Omaha, who were third in the West (in those days, two teams from the same division could meet in the final) but were significantly more physical despite the lack of dynamic scorers like Lincoln’s Chris Fournier and Brandon Bochenski, the top two scorers in the league. Omaha won that one in five. Will history repeat itself? The guess here is yes. Fargo in five.